A pilot study differentiating recurrent major depression from bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole

  • Hinz M
  • Stein A
  • Uncini T
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A novel method for differentiating and treating bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole from patients who are suffering a major depressive episode is explored in this work. To confirm the diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 bipolar disorder, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria require that at least one manic or hypomanic episode be identified. History of one or more manic or hypomanic episodes may be impossible to obtain, representing a potential blind spot in the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria. Many bipolar patients who cycle primarily on the depressive side for many years carry a misdiagnosis of recurrent major depression, leading to treatment with antidepressants that achieve little or no relief of symptoms. This article discusses a novel approach for diagnosing and treating patients with bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole versus patients with recurrent major depression.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hinz, M., Stein, A., & Uncini, T. (2010). A pilot study differentiating recurrent major depression from bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 741. https://doi.org/10.2147/ndt.s14353

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free