The limits and power of law: What the absence of #Metoo in Taiwan can tell us about legal mobilization

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The #MeToo movement gained global prominence after Hollywood celebrities came forward with their experiences of sexual violence and encouraged others to do the same. This was by no means the first time a woman had told the world of her experience of sexual violation, but this time, the powerful were paying attention: "Women have been saying these things forever. It is the response to them that has changed" (MacKinnon 2020, 7). High-quality investigative journalists vetted the women's accounts and provided more stories of sexual abuse and predation. Many survivors have since come forward with their own names and their perpetrators' names, leading some prominent men to be deprived of their fame and positions of power. The #MeToo movement makes two things matter and count: what the victims say and what the perpetrators did. It has raised the perpetrators' accountability and the victims' credibility and reversed the scenario of sexual violation: making the perpetrator, not the victim, pay for the sexual harm. Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, C. J. (2021, September 1). The limits and power of law: What the absence of #Metoo in Taiwan can tell us about legal mobilization. Politics and Gender. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X21000271

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free