Path planning for multi-UAV formation rendezvous based on distributed cooperative particle swarm optimization

72Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper studies the problem of generating cooperative feasible paths for formation rendezvous of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Cooperative path-planning for multi-UAV formation rendezvous is mostly a complicated multi-objective optimization problem with many coupled constraints. In order to satisfy the kinematic constraints, i.e., the maximum curvature constraint and the requirement of continuous curvature of the UAV path, the Pythagorean hodograph (PH) curve is adopted as the parameterized path because of its curvature continuity and rational intrinsic properties. Inspired by the co-evolutionary theory, a distributed cooperative particle swarm optimization (DCPSO) algorithm with an elite keeping strategy is proposed to generate a flyable and safe path for each UAV. This proposed algorithm can meet the kinematic constraints of UAVs and the cooperation requirements among UAVs. Meanwhile, the optimal or sub-optimal paths can be obtained. Finally, numerical simulations in 2-D and 3-D environments are conducted to demonstrate the feasibility and stability of the proposed algorithm. Simulation results show that the paths generated by the proposed DCPSO can not only meet the kinematic constraints of UAVs and safety requirements, but also achieve the simultaneous arrival and collision avoidance between UAVs for formation rendezvous. Compared with the cooperative co-evolutionary genetic algorithm (CCGA), the proposed DCPSO has better stability and a higher searching success rate.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shao, Z., Yan, F., Zhou, Z., & Zhu, X. (2019). Path planning for multi-UAV formation rendezvous based on distributed cooperative particle swarm optimization. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 9(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9132621

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

77%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

8%

Researcher 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 6

46%

Computer Science 5

38%

Chemical Engineering 1

8%

Design 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free