Assessment of disease burden in the phase III CELESTIAL trial of cabozantinib (C) versus placebo (P) in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

  • Blanc J
  • Meyer T
  • Cheng A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Extrahepatic spread (EHS) and macrovascular invasion (MVI) are poor prognostic factors in HCC. In the CELESTIAL trial (NCT01908426), C improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) vs P in patients (pts) with previously treated advanced HCC. Median OS was 10.2 mo with C vs 8.0 mo with P (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63-0.92; P=0.0049). Median PFS was 5.2 mo with C versus 1.9 mo with P (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.36-0.52; P<0.0001). Here, we analyze OS and PFS based on (i) EHS, (ii)MVI, and (iii) the sum of target lesion diameters (SOD) at baseline. Method(s): A total of 707 pts, stratified by disease etiology, geographic region, and the presence of EHS and/or MVI, were randomized 2:1 to receive C, 60 mg once daily (N=470) or P (N=237). Eligible patients had a pathologic diagnosis of HCC, Child- Pugh score A, and ECOG performance status

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blanc, J. F., Meyer, T., Cheng, A.-L., El-Khoueiry, A. B., Cicin, I., Chen, Y., … Abou-Alfa, G. K. (2018). Assessment of disease burden in the phase III CELESTIAL trial of cabozantinib (C) versus placebo (P) in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Annals of Oncology, 29, viii237. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy282.086

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free