On the power for linkage detection using a test based on scan statistics

3Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We analyze some aspects of scan statistics, which have been proposed to help for the detection of weak signals in genetic linkage analysis. We derive approximate expressions for the power of a test based on moving averages of the identity by descent allele sharing proportions for pairs of relatives at several contiguous markers. We confirm these approximate formulae by simulation. The results show that when there is a single trait-locus on a chromosome, the test based on the scan statistic is slightly less powerful than that based on the customary allele sharing statistic. On the other hand, if two genes having a moderate effect on a trait lie close to each other on the same chromosome, scan statistics improve power to detect linkage.

References Powered by Scopus

Genetic dissection of complex traits: Guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results

4548Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative

1183Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

True and false positive peaks in genomewide scans: Applications of length-biased sampling to linkage mapping

129Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Scan statistics in human gene mapping

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Strategies for conditional two-locus nonparametric linkage analysis

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reanalysis of a genome scan for schizophrenia loci using multigenic methods

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hernández, S., Siegmund, D. O., & De Gunst, M. (2005). On the power for linkage detection using a test based on scan statistics. Biostatistics, 6(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxi007

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘14‘17‘18‘19‘20‘22‘2500.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

25%

Researcher 3

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

40%

Mathematics 3

30%

Computer Science 2

20%

Social Sciences 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0