Need polynomial systems be doubly-exponential?

8Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Polynomial Systems, or at least their algorithms, have the reputation of being doubly-exponential in the number of variables (see the classic papers of Mayr & Mayer from 1982 and Davenport & Heintz from 1988). Nevertheless, the Bezout bound tells us that number of zeros of a zero-dimensional system is singly-exponential in the number of variables. How should this contradiction be reconciled? We first note that Mayr and Ritscher in 2013 showed the doubly exponential nature of Gröbner bases is with respect to the dimension of the ideal, not the number of variables. This inspires us to consider what can be done for Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition which produces a doubly-exponential number of polynomials of doubly-exponential degree. We review work from ISSAC 2015 which showed the number of polynomials could be restricted to doubly-exponential in the (complex) dimension using McCallum’s theory of reduced projection in the presence of equational constraints. We then discuss preliminary results showing the same for the degree of those polynomials. The results are under primitivity assumptions whose importance we illustrate.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Davenport, J. H., & England, M. (2016). Need polynomial systems be doubly-exponential? In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9725, pp. 157–164). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42432-3_20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free