Evidence-based diuretics: Focus on chlorthalidone and indapamide

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics are cornerstone treatments for hypertension. However, unlike chlorthalidone (CTD) and indapamide (IDP), hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) lacks evidence for reducing morbidity and mortality as monotherapy compared with placebo or control. Despite this fact, HCTZ is prescribed much more frequently than CTD or IDP. We believe that all hypertension guidelines should follow the National Institute for Health and Excellence (NICE) and make IDP and CTD first choice 'thiazide-like diuretics.' This article will focus on the available evidence pertaining to HCTZ versus CTD and IDP. We will review the pharmacological differences between these three diuretics, as well as the clinical trial data and important side effects.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dinicolantonio, J. J., Bhutani, J., Lavie, C. J., & O’Keefe, J. H. (2015, March 1). Evidence-based diuretics: Focus on chlorthalidone and indapamide. Future Cardiology. Future Medicine Ltd. https://doi.org/10.2217/fca.14.83

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free