Adequacy of fellowship training: Results of a survey of recently graduated fellows

14Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The adequacy of fellowship training in the field of infectious diseases was assessed by means of a survey of recently graduated fellows. Surveys were mailed to all individuals who had passed the American Board of Internal Medicine's board certification examination in infectious diseases since 1992. A total of 666 completed surveys were returned by the deadline (response rate, 36%). Although most recent graduates thought that training in the standard components of clinical infectious diseases was adequate, only 50% thought that training in infection control was adequate. Fewer than 1 in 3 believed that they had received adequate training in the business aspects of infectious diseases practice. The adequacy and duration of research training were linked to ultimate career choice. These results form the basis for the Infectious Diseases Society of America's new initiatives to assist with more-diversified and relevant fellowship training.

References Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Joiner, K. A., Dismukes, W. E., Britigan, B. E., Cohen, M. S., Johnson, W. D., Karchmer, A. W., … Stamm, W. E. (2001). Adequacy of fellowship training: Results of a survey of recently graduated fellows. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 32(2), 255–262. https://doi.org/10.1086/318462

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘18‘190481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

86%

Researcher 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 5

63%

Neuroscience 2

25%

Psychology 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0