Urinary creatinine as a nutritional and urinary volume marker in sheep fed with tropical or temperate forages

18Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To test the accuracy of creatinine as a marker for estimating urinary volume and its use as a nutritional index, the possible interference of forage intake and forage quality over creatinine excretion was evaluated. For this, sheep were fed different levels of pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L) Leeke) or Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam). The experiment consisted of a compilation of digestibility trials (n=6) with pearl millet or Italian ryegrass in completely randomized designs with four replications and four forage levels: 1.5, 2.0, 2.5% (kg dry matter (DM)/ 100 kg of live weight (LW)). The trials were repeated at different periods to evaluate how stable the average metabolic excretion of creatinine is. In each trial, total urine collection was performed individually during a period of 24 hours for five consecutive days and subsequently analyzed by colorimetry for creatinine and purine derivatives. The creatinine excretion was not affected (P>0.05) by forage offer or forage type, but there were period effects (P=0.0001). The average creatinine excretion for both forages was 0.21mmol/kg PV0,75. Linear regressions between the purine derivatives:creatinine index with total excretion of purine derivatives were detected for pearl millet (P<0.0001, R2= 0.64) and Italian ryegrass (P=0.02, R2=0.20). These results demonstrate that creatinine excretion is independent of the type and availability of forage and can be a marker for urinary volume prediction and nutritional measures under grazing systems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

David, D. B., Poli, C. H. E. C., Savian, J. V., Amaral, G. A., Azevedo, E. B., & Jochims, F. (2015). Urinary creatinine as a nutritional and urinary volume marker in sheep fed with tropical or temperate forages. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinaria e Zootecnia, 67(4), 1009–1015. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-7759

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free