Skip to main content

How accurate are electronic structure methods for actinoid chemistry?

Citations of this article
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text
This PDF is freely available from an open access repository. It may not have been peer-reviewed.


The CASPT2, CCSD, and CCSD(T) levels of wave function theory and seven density functionals were tested against experiment for predicting the ionization potentials and bond dissociation energies of actinoid monoxides and dioxides with their cations. The goal is to guide future work by enabling the choice of an appropriate method when performing calculations on actinoid-containing systems. We found that four density functionals, namely MPW3LYP, B3LYP, M05, and M06, and three levels of wave function theory, namely CASPT2, CCSD, and CCSD(T), give similar mean unsigned errors for actinoid-oxygen bond energies and for ionization potentials of actinoid oxides and their cations. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.




Averkiev, B. B., Mantina, M., Valero, R., Infante, I., Kovacs, A., Truhlar, D. G., & Gagliardi, L. (2011). How accurate are electronic structure methods for actinoid chemistry? Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, 129(3–5), 657–666.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free