This paper identifies ways in which traditional approaches to argumentation can be modified to meet the needs of practical group decision support. Three specific modifications are proposed. Firstly, a framework for accrual-based argumentation is presented. Second, a framework for outcome-driven decision rationale management is proposed that permits a novel conception of mixed-initiative argumentation. The framework is evaluated in the context of group decision support in medicine. © 2010 Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering.
CITATION STYLE
Chang, C. F., Miller, A., & Ghose, A. (2010). Mixed-initiative argumentation: Group decision support in medicine. In Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering (Vol. 27 LNICST, pp. 43–50). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11745-9_8
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.