Effects of cycling workstation to get tertiary employee moving on their overall health: study protocol for a REMOVE trial

1Citations
Citations of this article
152Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Sedentary behaviour (SB) and low levels of physical activity (PA) are predictors of morbidity and mortality. Tertiary employees spend a considerable amount of their daily time seated and new efficient strategies to both reduce sedentary time and increase physical activity are needed. In that context, the REMOVE study aims at evaluating the health effects of a 24-week cycling desk intervention among office workers. Methods: A prospective, open-label, multicentre, two-arm parallel, randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted in office-sitting desk workers. Office workers (N = 80) who have 0.8 full time equivalent hours (FTE) and 75% of this time in a sitting position will be recruited from tertiary worksites in Clermont-Ferrand, France. Subjects will be randomly assigned to one of the two following interventions: (i) PPM6: performance of two 30 min of cycling desk (using portable pedal exercise machine—PPM) per working day for 6 months or (ii) CTL_PPM3: 3 months with no intervention (control) followed by 3 months during which workers will be asked to complete two 30 min of PPM per working day. At baseline (T0), at 3 months (T1) and at 6 months (T2) after the start of the interventions, primary outcomes; 7-day PA and SB (3D-accelerometers), secondary outcomes; body composition (bioelectrical impedance), physical fitness (aerobic fitness, upper and lower limb strength), metabolic outcomes (fasting blood samples), self-perceived stress, anxiety, quality of life at work and job strain (questionnaires), tertiary outcomes; resting metabolic rate and cycling energy expenditure (indirect calorimetry) and eating behaviours (questionnaires) will be measured. An ergonomic approach based on observations and individual interviews will be used to identify parameters that could determine adherence. Discussion: The REMOVE study will be the first RCT to assess the effects of cycling workstations on objectively measured PA and SB during working and non-working hours and on key physiological and psychological health outcomes. This study will provide important information regarding the implementation of such cycling workstations in office workers and on the associated potential health benefits. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.govNCT04153214. Registered on November 2019, version 1

References Powered by Scopus

Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and β-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man

27963Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use

7136Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer

6031Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Effects of portable pedal machines at work on lipoprotein subfraction profile in sedentary workers – the REMOVE study

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guirado, T., Metz, L., Pereira, B., Bergouignan, A., Thivel, D., & Duclos, M. (2021). Effects of cycling workstation to get tertiary employee moving on their overall health: study protocol for a REMOVE trial. Trials, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05317-2

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

61%

Researcher 5

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 17

49%

Nursing and Health Professions 10

29%

Sports and Recreations 4

11%

Psychology 4

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free