Evaluation of APHA and AOAC II methods for phosphatase in butter and differentiation of milk and microbial phosphatases by agarose-gel electrophoresis.

6Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Salted and unsalted butters with 3 levels of phosphatase were prepared with both raw and pasteurized cream containing 36% fat. Test samples were analyzed for phosphatase by the modified method of the American Public Health Association (APHA) and the official AOAC method, 16.256 (1984, 14th Ed., 1990 15th Ed., 946.02). In the APHA method, weighing of solid frozen butter for testing yielded repeatable results. Addition of 0.0-1.0 mg magnesium to the butter had little effect on phosphatase activity in the APHA modified rapid colorimetric method (MRCM), but caused the phosphatase activity to decrease in the AOAC method. Phosphatase in salted and unsalted butters was quite stable at -17 +/- 1 degrees C and at 3.0 +/- 0.5 degrees C; however, within 2 to 4 days, freshly prepared butters stored at 22 +/- 1 degrees C developed reactivated and/or microbial phosphatases that were both heat-labile and heat-stable. At 22 +/- 1 degrees C, frozen butters showed decreased milk phosphatase activity before producing microbial phosphatase. Heat-labile phosphatases in salted and unsalted butters were inactivated at 62.8 degrees C for 10 min, and the phosphatase lability was partially due to the heat-denaturing effect of NaCl in salted butter. Some heat-stable phosphatases in unsalted butter survived at 66 degrees C for 30 min. Differentiation of milk phosphatase from microbial phosphatases was difficult by both methods; however, they were successfully differentiated by the agarose-gel electrophoretic technique.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Murthy, G. K., & Kaylor, L. O. (1990). Evaluation of APHA and AOAC II methods for phosphatase in butter and differentiation of milk and microbial phosphatases by agarose-gel electrophoresis. Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 73(5), 681–687. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/73.5.681

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free