Interception practices in Europe and their implications

12Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The dilemma of reconciling migration control functions and State obligations for refugee protection has underlined much of the immigration and asylum debate in the European Union. In recent years, numerous measures have been introduced to block access to refugee status determination. This paper focuses on EU policies of non-entrée as they relate to the interception of individuals en route to Europe. It argues that there is a fundamental imbalance in the Union's activities relating to asylum and migration management with recent measures having the effect of undermining the right to seek asylum and effectively blocking access to protection.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sianni, A. (2003). Interception practices in Europe and their implications. Refuge. York University. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.21306

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free