Lab experiments disagree on the efficacy of disclosure as a remedy to conflicts of interest (COIs). Some experiments suggest that disclosure has perverse effects, although others suggest these are mitigated by real-world factors (eg, feedback, sanctions, norms). This article argues that experiments reporting positive effects of disclosure often lack external validity: disclosure works best in lab experiments that make it unrealistically clear that the one disclosing is intentionally lying. We argue that even disclosed COIs remain dangerous in settings such as medicine where bias is often unintentional rather than the result of intentional corruption, and we conclude that disclosure might not be the panacea many seem to take it to be.
CITATION STYLE
Cain, D. M., & Banker, M. (2020). Medicine and society do conflict of interest disclosures facilitate public trust? AMA Journal of Ethics, 22(3), E232–E238. https://doi.org/10.1001/AMAJETHICS.2020.232
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.