Knowledge, satisfaction, and self-confidence in health professionals: Simulation with manikin versus simulated patient

1Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Combining various teaching strategies that merge theory and practice has been consid-ered an efficient method in health education. Objective: To compare health professionals’ knowledge, satisfaction, and self-confidence regarding clinical simulation with a high-fidelity manikin or a simulated patient. Methodology: A quasi-experimental study was carried out through the application of a theoretical knowledge test and the Student Satisfaction and Self-confidence in Learning Scale during a theoretical-practical course in prenatal care for health professionals. An inferential statistical analysis was performed. Results: Considering the 44 participants in the study, the mean of correct answers was 7 in the first theoretical knowledge test, and 8 in the second. Knowledge increased after theoretical explanation and simulation (p < 0.000). There was no significant difference between the “Actor” and “SimMan” simulation groups (p > 0.05) in the two dimensions concerning satisfaction and self-confidence. Conclusion: The overall mean of satisfaction and self-confidence was higher in the “Actor” group than in the “SimMan” group.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reis, S. N., Neves, C. C., Alves, D. A., de Sá Lopes, R. R., de Souza, K. V., Ribeiro, L. da C. C., & Guedes, H. M. (2020). Knowledge, satisfaction, and self-confidence in health professionals: Simulation with manikin versus simulated patient. Revista de Enfermagem Referencia, 2020(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.12707/RV20034

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free