A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of varithena® (Polidocanol endovenous microfoam 1%) for symptomatic, visible varicose veins with saphenofemoral junction incompetence

36Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: A randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of polidocanol endovenous microfoam (1%, Varithena™ [polidocanol injectable foam], BTG International Ltd.). Methods: Patients (n=77) with symptomatic, visible varicose veins were randomized to treatment with either Varithena 1% or placebo. Results: Varithena provided greater mean changes from Baseline in patient-reported assessments of symptoms (e.g., heaviness, achiness, swelling, throbbing, itching [HASTI™] score 30.7 points vs 16.7 points, p=0.0009, primary endpoint; and modified Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study-Quality-of-Life/Symptoms [m-VEINESQOL/ Sym; p<0.001]), physician-assessed VCSS, and physician- and patient-assessed appearance compared with placebo. The HASTI score correlated highly with the modified-VEINES-QOL/Sym and Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire-2 scores (r=0.7 to>0.9, p≤0.001). Adverse events included contusion, incision-site hematoma, and limb discomfort. Venous thrombus adverse events were reported as mild and generally resolved without sequelae. Conclusions: Varithena provided significantly greater symptom relief and improvement in leg appearance compared with placebo. Adverse events were generally mild and transient. (www.clinicaltrials.gov [NCT00758420]).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gibson, K., Kabnick, L., Morrison, N., Munavalli, G., & Regan, J. D. (2017). A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of varithena® (Polidocanol endovenous microfoam 1%) for symptomatic, visible varicose veins with saphenofemoral junction incompetence. Phlebology, 32(3), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355516635386

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free