The prognosis of depressive disorder in elderly primary care patients. An exploratory observational study: Course at 6 and 12 months

12Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective - To assess the course of depression or borderline depression and its determinants in elderly primary care patients. Design - An observational cohort study with three measurements, at inclusion and after 6 and 12 months. Setting - 14 general practitioners (GPs) in the western region of the Netherlands. Patients - From a baseline random sample of 582 consecutive elderly patients 65 + years of age, a total of 39 patients with depression and 60 with borderline depression were available for this cohort study. Main outcome measures - Diagnostic assessment was carried out in the patients' homes by trained interviewers according to the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (plus additional questions to assess minor depression). Results - Of the 39 patients with depression at baseline, 20 had depression after 6 months, and 18 after 12 months. Of the 60 patients with borderline depression at baseline, 53 had no evidence of depression after 6 months, and 54 had no evidence after 12 months. However, 7 patients had depression at 6 months and 6 patients at 12 months. Two determinants were related to a depressed state at 6 or 12 months among the patients with borderline depression: recognition by the GP and living with a partner. Conclusion - The results suggest that once elderly patients suffer from depression, this condition remains present for a long time. The prognosis for borderline depression was better, although 20% became depressed at 6 and/or 12 months. Future studies should aim to identify this group of patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Marwijk, H., Hermans, J., & Springer, M. P. (1998). The prognosis of depressive disorder in elderly primary care patients. An exploratory observational study: Course at 6 and 12 months. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 16(2), 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/028134398750003269

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free