Masculine Norms and Infectious Disease: The Case of COVID-19

29Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

During the novel coronavirus pandemic, early data suggested that men were slightly more likely to contract COVID-19 than women, less likely to seek medical attention for the disease, and far more likely to die as a result of COVID-19. While several studies have explored this gender gap, none has attempted to isolate the psychological processes underpinning this phenomenon. In this research note, I suggest that sexism partly explains these differences. Using data from a large (N = 100,689) survey of American adults conducted between March and June 2020 by the Democracy Fund and the University of California, Los Angeles (Nationscape), I find that sexist beliefs, a component of masculine norms, are consistently the strongest predictor of coronavirus-related emotions, behaviors, policy attitudes, and ultimately contracting COVID-19. This study highlights how gender ideology can impact health and impede government public health efforts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reny, T. T. (2020). Masculine Norms and Infectious Disease: The Case of COVID-19. Politics and Gender, 16(4), 1028–1035. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X20000380

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free