Identifiability of Causal Effects for Binary Variables with Baseline Data Missing Due to Death

3Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We discuss identifiability and estimation of causal effects of a treatment in subgroups defined by a covariate that is sometimes missing due to death, which is different from a problem with outcomes censored by death. Frangakis et al. (2007,Biometrics63, 641-662) proposed an approach for estimating the causal effects under a strong monotonicity (SM) assumption. In this article, we focus on identifiability of the joint distribution of the covariate, treatment and potential outcomes, show sufficient conditions for identifiability, and relax the SM assumption to monotonicity (M) and no-interaction (NI) assumptions. We derive expectation-maximization algorithms for finding the maximum likelihood estimates of parameters of the joint distribution under different assumptions. Further we remove the M and NI assumptions, and prove that signs of the causal effects of a treatment in the subgroups are identifiable, which means that their bounds do not cover zero. We perform simulations and a sensitivity analysis to evaluate our approaches. Finally, we apply the approaches to the National Study on the Costs and Outcomes of Trauma Centers data, which are also analyzed by Frangakis et al. (2007) and Xie and Murphy (2007, Biometrics 63, 655-658). © 2011, The International Biometric Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yan, W., Hu, Y., & Geng, Z. (2012). Identifiability of Causal Effects for Binary Variables with Baseline Data Missing Due to Death. Biometrics, 68(1), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01653.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free