Penetration of time to change leaflets on stigmatised attitudes to people with mental illness

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aims and method: To determine whether members of the general public read a leaflet from the Time to Change anti-stigma campaign. The leaflets were sent to 1000 members of the public at random. Those who read the leaflet were asked, in a statement concealed within the text, to return it. A second study involved modified leaflets being posted to 400 members of a representative panel of the UK general public. Results: Only 20 of the 1000 (2%) people who received the unsolicited leaflet returned them, which suggests that the vast majority were unread. However, the leaflet achieved a good response in the sample from the research panel with at least 29% of participants (115 of 400) reading the leaflet. Clinical implications: A very small proportion of people acknowledge unsolicited leaflets. However, the leaflet was read by almost a third of a research panel. Hence, few people are likely to read unsolicited leaflets, including those containing a public health message. Declaration of interest: None.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mendes, V., Easow, J. M., & Luty, J. (2012). Penetration of time to change leaflets on stigmatised attitudes to people with mental illness. Psychiatrist, 36(10), 371–374. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.110.033795

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free