Improved detection of bacterial growth in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis effluent by use of BacT/Alert FAN bottles

48Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Culture-negative peritonitis is a major complication for patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and precludes organism- specific therapy. The aim of the present study was to compare inoculation of 10 ml of CAPD effluent into BacT/Alert blood culture bottles (FAN [fastidious antimicrobic neutralizing], BacTAlert aerobic [BTA], and BacT/Alert anaerobic [BTAn] bottles) to our conventional method of using 50 ml of concentrated CAPD effluent to inoculate peptone broth bottles (BD bottles) and MacConkey agar and blood agar medium (BA-MAC). The FAN, BTA, and BTAn bottles were monitored automatically in the BacT/Alert blood culture instrument. A total of 207 CAPD effluents were studied, and in 97 bacteria were detected by at least one method. Compared to BTA bottles (79 of 97; 81.4%), BTAn bottles (78 of 97; 80.4%), and BD bottles (88 of 97; 90.7%), the single best broth medium for detecting bacterial growth in CAPD effluents was the FAN bottle (90 of 97 effluents; 92.8%). A total of 125 bacterial species were detected by any method, and the majority (91.8%) of CAPD effluents were infected with a single species. A combination of FAN and BTAn bottles detected 111 of 125 (88.8%) of all organisms, whereas a combination of BD bottles and BA-MAC detected 107 of 125 (85.6%) of all organisms. One or more organisms that would have been completely missed by the conventional method with BD bottles and BA-MAC were detected in 18 CAPD effluents. Of these 18 CAPD effluents, 6 showed no growth by the conventional method with BD bottles and BA-MAC. On the basis of our data, the must sensitive and least labor intensive method was direct inoculation of 10 ml of CAPD effluent into a FAN bottle and a BTAn bottle, which could be automatically monitored by the BacT/Alert blood culture instrument. On the basis of case definitions for peritonitis, the sensitivities and specificities of the methods with FAN and BTAn bottles and with BD bottles and BA-MAC were 81.1 and 98.8% and 74.5 and 96.5%, respectively.

References Powered by Scopus

Peritonitis during continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

253Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis treatment recommendations: 1993 update

143Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Microbiological aspects of peritonitis associated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

103Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Peritoneal dialysis-related infections recommendations: 2010 update

780Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

ISPD peritonitis recommendations: 2016 update on prevention and treatment

777Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Peritoneal dialysis-related infections recommendations: 2005 update

693Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alfa, M. J., Degagne, P., Olson, N., & Harding, G. K. M. (1997). Improved detection of bacterial growth in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis effluent by use of BacT/Alert FAN bottles. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 35(4), 862–866. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.35.4.862-866.1997

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

43%

Researcher 4

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 12

67%

Chemistry 2

11%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

11%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free