What’s in an image

15Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper discusses the ontological status of remote sensing images, from a GIScience perspective. We argue that images have a dual nature—they are fields at the measurement level and fiat objects at the classification level—and that images have an ontological description of their own, distinct and independent from the domain ontology a domain scientist uses. This paper proposes a multi-level ontology for images, combining both field and object approaches and distinguishing between image and user ontologies. The framework developed contributes to the design of a new generation of integrated GISs, since two key benefits are achieved: (1) the support for multiple perspectives for the same image and (2) an emphasis on using images for the detection of spatial-temporal configurations of geographic phenomena.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Câmara, G., Egenhofer, M. J., Fonseca, F., & Monteiro, A. M. V. (2001). What’s in an image. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 2205, pp. 474–488). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45424-1_32

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free