Evaluation of GPT-4 ability to identify and generate patient instructions for actionable incidental radiology findings

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the proficiency of a HIPAA-compliant version of GPT-4 in identifying actionable, incidental findings from unstructured radiology reports of Emergency Department patients. To assess appropriateness of artificial intelligence (AI)-generated, patient-facing summaries of these findings. Materials and Methods: Radiology reports extracted from the electronic health record of a large academic medical center were manually reviewed to identify non-emergent, incidental findings with high likelihood of requiring follow-up, further sub-stratified as “definitely actionable” (DA) or “possibly actionable—clinical correlation” (PA-CC). Instruction prompts to GPT-4 were developed and iteratively optimized using a validation set of 50 reports. The optimized prompt was then applied to a test set of 430 unseen reports. GPT-4 performance was primarily graded on accuracy identifying either DA or PA-CC findings, then secondarily for DA findings alone. Outputs were reviewed for hallucinations. AI-generated patient-facing summaries were assessed for appropriateness via Likert scale. Results: For the primary outcome (DA or PA-CC), GPT-4 achieved 99.3% recall, 73.6% precision, and 84.5% F-1. For the secondary outcome (DA only), GPT-4 demonstrated 95.2% recall, 77.3% precision, and 85.3% F-1. No findings were “hallucinated” outright. However, 2.8% of cases included generated text about recommendations that were inferred without specific reference. The majority of True Positive AI-generated summaries required no or minor revision. Conclusion: GPT-4 demonstrates proficiency in detecting actionable, incidental findings after refined instruction prompting. AI-generated patient instructions were most often appropriate, but rarely included inferred recommendations. While this technology shows promise to augment diagnostics, active clinician oversight via “human-in-the-loop” workflows remains critical for clinical implementation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Woo, K. M. C., Simon, G. W., Akindutire, O., Aphinyanaphongs, Y., Austrian, J. S., Kim, J. G., … Kang, S. K. (2024). Evaluation of GPT-4 ability to identify and generate patient instructions for actionable incidental radiology findings. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 31(9), 1983–1993. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocae117

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free