Valve's Way: Vayward, Visionary, or Voguish?

  • Foss N
  • Dobrajska M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Puranam and Håkonsson (2015) challenge us to ponder what we as organization design theorists make of Valve’s way (see also Jeppesen, 2008). We believe that Valve, in spite of its radical vision, does not represent a challenge to fundamental organization design theory and that it is questionable to what extent it represents a new blueprint for organization design, despite it being consistent with an “egalitarian Zeitgeist” (Puranam, 2014). In fact, managerial authority may be of increasing importance rather than the opposite (Guadalupe, Li, & Wulf, 2015). Thus, Valve is, and will remain, an outlier, albeit a voguish one.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Foss, N. J., & Dobrajska, M. (2015). Valve’s Way: Vayward, Visionary, or Voguish? Journal of Organization Design, 4(2), 12. https://doi.org/10.7146/jod.20162

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

68%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

10%

Researcher 3

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 20

67%

Social Sciences 5

17%

Engineering 3

10%

Psychology 2

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free