Comparison between dexamethasone and methylprednisolone therapy in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to non-intensive medical units

4Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

(1) Background: Data on different steroid compounds for the treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) patients are still limited. The aim of this study was to compare COVID-19 patients admitted to non-intensive units and treated with methylprednisolone or dexamethasone. (2) Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study that included consecutive patients with COVID-19 hospitalized in medical wards during the second wave of the pandemic. Thirty-day mortality and the need for intensive or semi-intensive care were the main clinical outcomes analyzed in patients receiving methylprednisolone (60 mg/day) compared with dexamethasone (6 mg/day). Secondary outcomes included complication rates, length of hospital stay, and time to viral clearance. (3) Results: Two-hundred-forty-six patients were included in the analysis, 110 treated with dexamethasone and 136 with methylprednisolone. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups of patients regarding 30-day mortality (OR 1.35, CI95% 0.71–2.56, p = 0.351) and the need for intensive or semi-intensive care (OR 1.94, CI95% 0.81–4.66, p = 0.136). The complication rates, length of hospital stay, and time to viral clearance did not significantly differ between the two groups. (4) Conclusions: In patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in non-intensive units, the choice of different steroid compounds, such as dexamethasone or methylprednisolone, did not affect the main clinical outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Buso, R., Cinetto, F., Dell’edera, A., Veneran, N., Facchini, C., Biscaro, V., … Felice, C. (2021). Comparison between dexamethasone and methylprednisolone therapy in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to non-intensive medical units. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245812

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free