Advances and controversies in the design of obesity prevention trials

64Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Because randomized controlled trial designs are used more frequently to evaluate obesity prevention programs, nuances in the methodology used for this application become apparent. Areas of attention are the selection of outcome measures with high validity, attention to the description of the intervention, the use of analyses that match the sampling design, and dealing with loss to follow-up. We recommend increased use of preliminary or evidentiary research designed to develop and test intervention components and hypothesized mediators before fully powered, randomized, obesity prevention trials are attempted. Both randomized and observational designs can be used for the purpose. Attention to design issues will ultimately lead to more successful, cost-effective randomized trials, and more rapid movement toward efficacious and effective obesity prevention programs. Copyright © 2007 NAASO.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stevens, J., Taber, D. R., Murray, D. M., & Ward, D. S. (2007). Advances and controversies in the design of obesity prevention trials. Obesity. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2007.257

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free