Increasing urbanisation results in more people and assets being placed in harm's way of flooding. However, these trends can be counteracted by land-use planning inside (peri-)urban areas and access to risk-transfer mechanisms, such as insurance or government compensation schemes. Risk-transfer mechanisms provide compensation helping people recover faster after a flood event or potentially provide incentives to alter their level of precautionary behaviour. Both mechanism avenues improve the ability to improve flood-risk management by improving resilience of the urban system across three pillars: recovery (the ability to return to the pre-flood state), resistance (the ability to lower flood impacts), and adaptive capacity (the ability to learn and positively transform the flood-risk management system). The series of examples presented in this chapter suggest that both ex-ante risk-transfer and urban planning require systemic approaches to be successful, which creates the potential for synergies. Integrating both instruments leads to a more resilient society.
CITATION STYLE
Hudson, P., & Slavíková, L. (2022). The role of risk transfer and spatial planning for enhancing the flood resilience of cities. In Spatial Flood Risk Management: Implementing Catchment-based Retention and Resilience on Private LandFront (pp. 148–162). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800379534.00019
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.