Synthetic Biology: Public Perceptions of an Emergent Field

  • Pardo Avellaneda R
  • Hagen K
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We analyze some of the issues that synthetic biology raises for the social sciences within the “public perceptions of science” framework. The chang- ing roles of public perceptions in policy making are described in relation with changes in the institutional and cultural contexts of science. We take a closer look at the available empirical evidence about public views on synthetic biology against the background of what is known about public perceptions of biotechnology more generally. Many vectors influence public attitudes to biotechnology, notably risk perceptions, tradeoffs between goals and means, ethical views, and trust in science and regulatory institutions. Attitudes are also associated with frames, symbols and worldviews. One of the central worldviews that affects subsets of the life sciences is the current vision of nature: many people are aware of problematic aspects of economic growth that makes intensive use of science and technology, and there is therefore sensitivity to scientific progress that further challenges the boundaries of “natural” processes and objects. Synthetic biology has components in potential conflict with the public’s preference for “naturalness” in many areas, although this is at present dormant due to the low salience of syn- thetic biology in the media and public.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pardo Avellaneda, R., & Hagen, K. (2016). Synthetic Biology: Public Perceptions of an Emergent Field (pp. 127–170). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25145-5_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free