Compare the prognosis of da Vinci robot-Assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) with video-Assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for non-small cell lung cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract

To determine if there are advantages to transitioning to Da Vinci robotics by a surgeon compared to the video-Assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy.A systematic electronic search of online electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library updated on December 2017. Publications on comparison Da Vinci-robot-Assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and video-Assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for non-small cell lung cancer were collected. Meta-Analysis RevMan 5.3 software (The Cochrane collaboration, Oxford, UK) was used to analyze the combined pooled HRs using fixed or random-effects models according to the heterogeneity.Fourteen retrospective cohort studies were included. No statistical difference was found between the 2 groups with respect to conversion to open, dissected lymph nodes number, hospitalization time after surgery, duration of surgery, drainage volume after surgery, prolonged air leak, and morbidity (P>.05).Da Vinci-RATS lobectomy is a feasible and safe technique and can achieve an equivalent surgical efficacy when compared with VATS. There does not seem to be a significant advantage for an established VATS lobectomy surgeon to transition to robotics based on clinical outcomes.