The c-index is not proper for the evaluation of t-year predicted risks

94Citations
Citations of this article
94Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We show that the widely used concordance index for time to event outcome is not proper when interest is in predicting a t-year risk of an event, for example 10-year mortality. In the situation with a fixed prediction horizon, the concordance index can be higher for a misspecified model than for a correctly specified model. Impropriety happens because the concordance index assesses the order of the event times and not the order of the event status at the prediction horizon. The time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve does not have this problem and is proper in this context.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blanche, P., Kattan, M. W., & Gerds, T. A. (2019). The c-index is not proper for the evaluation of t-year predicted risks. Biostatistics, 20(2), 347–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxy006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free