Cooled radiofrequency denervation for treatment of sacroiliac joint pain: two-year results from 20 cases

  • Ho K
  • Hadi
  • Pasutharnchat K
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Sacroiliac joint pain is a common cause of chronic low back pain. Different techniques for radiofrequency denervation of the sacroiliac joint have been used to treat this condition. However, results have been inconsistent because the variable sensory supply to the sacroiliac joint is difficult to disrupt completely using conventional radiofrequency. Cooled radiofrequency is a novel technique that uses internally cooled radiofrequency probes to enlarge lesion size, thereby increasing the chance of completely denervating the sacroiliac joint. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of cooled radiofrequency denervation using the SInergy™ cooled radiofrequency system for sacroiliac joint pain. Methods: The charts of 20 patients with chronic sacroiliac joint pain who had undergone denervation using the SInergy TM cooled radiofrequency system were reviewed at two years following the procedure. Outcome measures included the Numeric Rating Scale for pain intensity, Patient Global Impression of Change, and Global Perceived Effect for patient satisfaction. Results: Fifteen of 20 patients showed a significant reduction in pain (a decrease of at least three points on the Numeric Rating Scale). Mean Numeric Rating Scale for pain decreased from 7.4 ± 1.4 to 3.1 ± 2.5, mean Patient Global Impression of Change was " improved " (1.4 ± 1.5), and Global Perceived Effect was reported to be positive in 16 patients at two years following the procedure. Conclusion: Cooled radiofrequency denervation showed long-term efficacy for up to two years in the treatment of sacroiliac joint pain.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ho, K.-Y., Hadi, Pasutharnchat, K., & Tan. (2013). Cooled radiofrequency denervation for treatment of sacroiliac joint pain: two-year results from 20 cases. Journal of Pain Research, 505. https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s46827

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free