Ethical and Organizational Issues in Adopting a Pediatric Protocol for Controlled Donation After Circulatory Determination of Death

  • Harrison C
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Despite two decades of ethical and clinical debate, controlled donation after circulatory determination of death (cDCDD) remains a controversial practice, especially in pediatrics. While debates continue both nationally and internationally, it can be challenging for pediatric hospitals to build agreement on a cDCDD policy among their own constituents. After briefly reviewing the state of the larger debates, this chapter describes organizational steps involved in developing a cDCDD policy for one deeply divided pediatric hospital community. Tracing the experience of a large, tertiary-care teaching hospital and transplant center, the chapter reports the work of a multidisciplinary task force that developed an empirical evidence base and an ethical "constitution" for a cDCDD program, as well as a protocol for pediatric cDCDD. The chapter highlights a number of philosophical and practical issues considered in this process, including questions about the compatibility of a cDCDD program with the overall mission of the hospital. Also described are organizational measures aimed at forging a transparent, legitimate policy in a context of partial stakeholder agreement and persistent controversy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harrison, C. H. (2016). Ethical and Organizational Issues in Adopting a Pediatric Protocol for Controlled Donation After Circulatory Determination of Death (pp. 131–150). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29185-7_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free