New principles and new paths needed for online research in mental health: Commentary on Burnette et al. (2021)

9Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Online methods have become a powerful research tool, allowing us to conduct well-powered studies, to explore and replicate effects, and to recruit often rare and diverse samples. However, concerns about the validity and reliability of the data collected from some platforms have reached crescendo. In this issue, Burnette et al. (2021) describe how commonly employed protective measures such as captchas, response consistency requirements, and attention checks may no longer be sufficient to ensure high-quality data in survey-based studies on Amazon's Mechanical Turk. We echo and elaborate on these concerns, but believe that although imperfect, online research will continue to be incredibly important in driving progress in mental health science. Not all platforms or populations are well suited to every research question and so we posit that the future of online research will be much more varied, and in no small part supported by citizen scientists and those with lived experience. Whatever the medium, researchers cannot stand still; we must continuously reflect and adapt to technological advances, demographics, and motivational shifts of our participants. Online research is difficult but worthwhile.

References Powered by Scopus

An MTurk Crisis? Shifts in Data Quality and the Impact on Study Results

743Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Work experiences on MTurk: Job satisfaction, turnover, and information sharing

157Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Smartphones and the Neuroscience of Mental Health

49Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Identifying Transdiagnostic Mechanisms in Mental Health Using Computational Factor Modeling

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Convenience Sampling Methods in Psychology: A Comparison Between Crowdsourced and Student Samples

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Precision in Psychiatry (PIP) study: Testing an internet-based methodology for accelerating research in treatment prediction and personalisation

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Donegan, K. R., & Gillan, C. M. (2022, February 1). New principles and new paths needed for online research in mental health: Commentary on Burnette et al. (2021). International Journal of Eating Disorders. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23670

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 4

67%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

17%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 5

71%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

14%

Social Sciences 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free