Between Preaching and Judging: the Muslim Brotherhood and the Predicament of takfīr (1960s-1980s)

0Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Both as a slogan and a book, “Preachers, not Judges” has long dominated academic narratives about the Muslim Brotherhood's turn towards 'moderation' in the 1970s and 1980s. However, upon examination, several commonplace assumptions about “Preachers, not Judges” do not hold. Firstly, the Muslim Brotherhood never renounced takfīr as a basic doctrine. It only debated different ways of implementing this doctrine in practice. Secondly, “Preachers, not Judges” was much less clear and authoritative as a doctrinal statement than often assumed. It is better understood as a tactical manoeuvre aimed at avoiding splits within the movement. Based primarily on a new and comprehensive survey of contemporary sources from the 1970s, this article will propose a revised understanding of Muslim Brotherhood discourse on preaching, judging, and the doctrine of takfīr that remains relevant until the present day.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Elsässer, S. (2024). Between Preaching and Judging: the Muslim Brotherhood and the Predicament of takfīr (1960s-1980s). Islamic Law and Society, 31(3), 235–259. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-bja10044

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free