Selection of the surgical approach for patients with cStage IA lung squamous cell carcinoma: A population-based propensity score matching analysis

2Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to conduct a comparative analysis of the survival rates after segmentectomy, wedge resection, or lobectomy in patients with cStage IA lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Methods: We enrolled 4,316 patients who had cStage IA lung SCC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The Cox proportional hazards model was conducted to recognize the potential risk factors for overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS). To eliminate potential biases of included patients, the propensity score matching (PSM) method was used. OS and LCSS rates were compared among three groups stratified according to tumor size. Results: Kaplan–Meier analyses revealed no statistical differences in the rates of OS and LCSS between wedge resection (WR) and segmentectomy (SG) groups for patients who had cStage IA cancers. In patients with tumors ≤ 1 cm, LCSS favored lobectomy (Lob) compared to segmentectomy (SG), but a similar survival rate was obtained for wedge resection (WR) and lobectomy (Lob). For patients with tumors sized 1.1 to 2 cm, lobectomy had improved OS and LCSS rates compared to the segmentectomy or wedge resection groups, with the exception of a similar OS rate for lobectomy and segmentectomy. For tumors sized 2.1 to 3 cm, lobectomy had a higher rate of OS or LCSS than wedge resection or segmentectomy, except that lobectomy conferred a similar LCSS rate compared to segmentectomy. Multivariable analyses showed that patients aged ≥75 and tumor sizes of >2 to ≤3 cm were potential risk factors for OS and LCSS, while lobectomy and first malignant primary indicator were considered protective factors. The Cox proportional analysis also confirmed that male patients aged ≥65 to <75 were independent prognostic factors that are indicative of a worse OS rate. Conclusions: The tumor size can influence the surgical procedure recommended for individuals with cStage IA lung SCC. For patients with tumors ≤1 cm, lobectomy is the recommended approach, and wedge resection or segmentectomy might be an alternative for those who cannot tolerate lobectomy if adequate surgical margin is achievable and enough nodes are sampled. For tumors >1 to ≤3 cm, lobectomy showed better survival outcomes than sublobar resection. Our findings require further validation by randomized controlled trial (RCT) or other evidence.

References Powered by Scopus

Cancer Statistics, 2021

18396Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer

2746Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reduced lung-cancer mortality with volume CT screening in a randomized trial

2321Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Systematic review and meta-analysis of segmentectomy vs. lobectomy for stage IA non-small cell lung cancer

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Survival after Lung Metastasectomy from Esophageal Cancer: Results from a Multi-Institutional Database

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shao, S., Song, G., Wang, Y., Yi, T., Li, S., Chen, F., … Liu, Y. (2022). Selection of the surgical approach for patients with cStage IA lung squamous cell carcinoma: A population-based propensity score matching analysis. Frontiers in Oncology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.946800

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

50%

Researcher 1

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0