Dynamic analysis of half car model with MR damper as semi-active suspension element

4Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper presents the dynamic analysis of a half-car model with a magnetorheological (MR) damper subjected to random excitation. Experimental studies have been conducted to predict the behavior of the prototype twin-tube MR damper. The mathematical model of the prototype MR damper has been proposed by using the Bouc-Wen model. The half-car model with the MR damper has been used to predict the ride comfort and road holding performance. Comparative studies between the half-car model with the passive and semi-active suspension system with a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control shows that the MR damper suspension system offers a good performance.

References Powered by Scopus

Phenomenological model for magnetorheological dampers

2242Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Digital simulation of random processes and its applications

1578Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Applications of optimal control to advanced automotive suspension design

264Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A new AI-surrogate model for dynamics analysis of a magnetorheological damper in the semi-active seat suspension

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Robust H<inf>∞</inf> controller in a MRF engine mount for improving the vehicle ride comfort

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Newly Developed Current Source Based Shortening and Modeling Methods for Magnetorheological Damper Response Time

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hemanth, K., Kumar, H., & Gangadharan, K. V. (2018). Dynamic analysis of half car model with MR damper as semi-active suspension element. International Journal of Acoustics and Vibrations, 23(2), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.20855/ijav.2018.23.21131

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

36%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

27%

Researcher 3

27%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 11

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free