Simplicity versus complexity in the european debate: Identity, responsibility, and the dialogue Questioned

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This contribution aims to analyse current challenges of populism and nationalism by using the apparatus of political philosophy. Three important philosophic categories, such as identity, responsibility, and dialogue, are discussed while reflecting on current collisions. By showing their interrelated character, the author underlines the issue of speechlessness and multilateral lack of communication between people, people and the establishment, different intellectual groups, and so forth. Linking populism and nationalism to identity peculiarities, and reflecting on the fluidity of meanings, the power of words, and the related responsibility, this work claims the crucial importance and necessity of dialogue as the main instrument which can prevent dangerous consequences of irresponsibility, and identifies academics and public intellectuals as possible initiators of the dialogue.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khutsishvili, K. (2019). Simplicity versus complexity in the european debate: Identity, responsibility, and the dialogue Questioned. In Anti-Europeanism: Critical Perspectives Towards the European Union (pp. 135–145). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24428-6_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free