Preliminary cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of cemiplimab in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in italy

3Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is a common cancer that in most cases is curable with surgery. About 3–5% of patients develop advanced CSCC (aCSCC) and are no longer responsive to surgery or radiation therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of cemiplimab, the first systemic therapy approved in Italy for patients with aCSCC, vs platinum-based chemotherapy from the Italian National Health Service (SSN) perspective. Methods: A partitioned survival model, which included three mutually exclusive health states, was developed to estimate costs and outcomes for patients with aCSCC, over a 30-year time horizon (lifetime). No direct evidence of the comparative efficacy and safety of cemiplimab versus other therapies currently exists. Therefore, a simulated treatment comparison (STC) was conducted to estimate the comparative efficacy of cemiplimab versus che-motherapy. Individual patient data for cemiplimab were collected from the EMPOWER-CSCC 1 trial whereas chemotherapy data were derived from a retrospective study. In the STC a regression model was used to predict outcomes for cemiplimab in the population observed in the comparator study. Costs of drug acquisition/administration and management of adverse events were included. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% per year. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) were calculated; sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed to assess the robustness of results. Results: In the base-case, treatment with cemiplimab was associated with a gain of 4.89 LYs and 3.99 QALYs, compared with a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen, resulting in an estimated ICER of 27,821 €/LY gained and an ICUR of 34,110 €/QALY gained. Both ICER and ICUR were below the commonly used Italian SSN willingness to pay thresholds. Conclusion: The use of cemiplimab, compared with a platinum-based chemotherapy regi-men, can be considered a cost-effective option for the treatment of aCSCC patients in Italy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ghetti, G., D’avella, M. C., & Pradelli, L. (2021). Preliminary cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of cemiplimab in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in italy. ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research, 13, 121–133. https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S295605

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free