A comparison of static and dynamic ∆B0 mapping methods for correction of CEST MRI in the presence of temporal B0 field variations

24Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the performance, in the presence of scanner instabilities, of three dynamic correction methods which integrate ∆B0 mapping into the chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) measurement and three established static ∆B0-correction approaches. Methods: A homogeneous phantom and five healthy volunteers were scanned with a CEST sequence at 7 T. The in vivo measurements were performed twice: first with unaltered system frequency and again applying frequency shifts during the CEST acquisition. In all cases, retrospective voxel-wise ∆B0-correction was performed using one intrinsic and two extrinsic [prescans with dual-echo gradient-echo and water saturation shift referencing (WASSR)] static approaches. These were compared with two intrinsic [using phase data directly generated by single-echo or double-echo GRE (gradient-echo) CEST readout (CEST-GRE-2TE)] and one extrinsic [phase from interleaved dual-echo EPI (echo planar imaging) navigator (NAV-EPI-2TE)] dynamic ∆B0-correction approaches [allowing correction of each Z-spectral point before magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym) analysis]. Results: All three dynamic methods successfully mapped the induced drift. The intrinsic approaches were affected by the CEST labeling near water (∆ω <0.01%/Hz without the need of external scans. The CEST-GRE-2TE and NAV-EPI-2TE resulted in highly consistent MTRasym values with/without drift for all subjects. Conclusion: Reliable correction of scanner instabilities is essential to establish clinical CEST MRI. The three dynamic approaches presented improved the ∆B0-correction performance significantly in the presence of frequency drift compared to established static methods. Among them, the self-corrected CEST-GRE-2TE was the most accurate and straightforward to implement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Poblador Rodriguez, E., Moser, P., Dymerska, B., Robinson, S., Schmitt, B., van der Kouwe, A., … Bogner, W. (2019). A comparison of static and dynamic ∆B0 mapping methods for correction of CEST MRI in the presence of temporal B0 field variations. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 82(2), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27750

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free