"By Turns Pleased and Confounded": A Report on One Writing Center's RAD Assessments

  • Pleasant S
  • Niiler L
  • Jagannathan K
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study builds on extant replicable, aggregable, and data-supported (RAD) research to posit and examine correlations between writing center intervention and improved student writing. The authors review three decades of quantitative writing center scholarship and provide data resulting from four writing center assessments. These assessments include two pre-and post-intervention studies and two intervention/ non-intervention studies. Results are mixed. The pre-and post-intervention studies show statistically significant improvements in student writing. The intervention/non-intervention studies show considerable to limited improvements in student writing. Possible reasons for these results are discussed, including study protocols, self-selection bias, and the difficulty of imposing controls. Impacts on the practice of one writing center are shared, and suggestions for further research are provided.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pleasant, S., Niiler, L., & Jagannathan, K. (2016). “By Turns Pleased and Confounded”: A Report on One Writing Center’s RAD Assessments. Writing Center Journal, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.7771/2832-9414.1843

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free