Predictive models of water application and distribution efficiency in conventional sprinkling

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Correct determinations of distribution (Ed) and application (EA) efficiencies allow adequate estimations of the gross irrigation depth. This study aimed: i) to determine the distribution efficiency using the Christiansen uniformity coefficient (CUC) in a sprinkler irrigation system under different weather conditions and working pressures; ii) to compare the mean, median, and cumulative CUC values; and iii) to evaluate the predictive capacity of four EA estimation models. CUC values were determined from 80 assessments, as well as the mean, median, and cumulative. The precipitated water depth accumulated in each collector was considered for the accumulated CUC. More uniform evaluations were used for EA (working pressure of 196 kPa), resulting in 20 samples. Besides being measured, EA was estimated by Keller & Bliesner, Playan, Tarjuelo, and Beskow methods. Statistical indicators were the root mean square error, mean bias error, Willmott agreement index, mean absolute error, and Pearson correlation coefficient. CUC values ranged from 66.51 to 92.04%, and the accumulated CUC provided an improvement over the isolated evaluations. The Beskow model had the best EA estimations in conventional spraying.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Araújo, E. D., Santos, D. L., Alvino, F. C. G., Ferreira, L. B., & da Cunha, F. F. (2020). Predictive models of water application and distribution efficiency in conventional sprinkling. Engenharia Agricola, 40(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-ENG.AGRIC.V40N1P24-33/2020

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free