Participatory action research to pilot a model of mental health service user involvement in an Ethiopian rural primary healthcare setting: Study protocol

14Citations
Citations of this article
113Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background : Involvement of service-users at all levels of the mental health system is a policy imperative in many countries internationally. However, putting policy into practice seems complex; little is known about how best to involve service users and efforts are often criticized for being tokenistic. In low-and-middle income countries, less attention has been given to the roles of service users within mental health systems. The proposed study is part of a larger project intended to develop service-user involvement in mental health system strengthening in Ethiopia. A Theory of Change (ToC) model has already been developed through a participatory approach. This study protocol aims to describe the theoretical background and methods to pilot this model using participatory action research (PAR) and explore participants' experience of involvement. Methods: The proposed study will apply a PAR approach situated in critical social theory and conduct a phenomenological case study to find out participants' experience of involvement. This will be conducted in three stages. The focus of Stage 1 will be to(i) establish a Research Advisory Group (RAG), and Research Participant Group (RPG) at district and primary healthcare facility levels, respectively, and (ii) identify and prioritize potential areas of concern for involvement in the domains of advocacy, service planning and development, monitoring and improving service quality. In Stage 2, we will work with the RPG to develop a plan of action for the selected area. Stage 3 will aim to assist the RPG to implement and evaluate the plan of action. Process indicators and observation will be combined with in-depth interviews with participants to elicit their experiences of involvement. Thematic content analysis will be used. Discussion: The participatory approach to mental health service user involvement in health system strengthening employed by this study will support the implementation of solutions through locally relevant and contextualized actions. Findings from this study will contribute to the body of knowledge towards understanding the complexity of implementation of service user involvement and refine the ToC model for transferability to similar settings.

References Powered by Scopus

Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

4516Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research

1090Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review

1002Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The role of advocacy and empowerment in shaping service development for families raising children with developmental disabilities

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Empowerment training to support service user involvement in mental health system strengthening in rural Ethiopia: a mixed-methods pilot study

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Using participatory action research to pilot a model of service user and caregiver involvement in mental health system strengthening in Ethiopian primary healthcare: a case study

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abayneh, S., Lempp, H., & Hanlon, C. (2020). Participatory action research to pilot a model of mental health service user involvement in an Ethiopian rural primary healthcare setting: Study protocol. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-019-0175-x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 32

67%

Lecturer / Post doc 8

17%

Researcher 6

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 17

38%

Social Sciences 12

27%

Psychology 9

20%

Medicine and Dentistry 7

16%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free