The risk of rupture in untreated aneurysms: The impact of size, gender, and expansion rate

297Citations
Citations of this article
190Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to establish the risk of rupture as related to size of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), gender, and expansion of the aneurysm. Methods: Between 1976 and 2001, 476 patients with conditions considered unfit for surgery with AAA 5.0 cm or more were followed with computed tomographic scans every 6 months until rupture, surgery, death, or deletion from follow-up. Surgery was performed for rupture (n = 22), improved medical condition (n = 37), increase in size (n = 95), symptoms (n = 17), and other reasons (n = 24). Results: Fifty ruptures occurred during the follow-up period. The average risk of rupture (and standard error) in male patients with 5.0-cm to 5.9-cm AAA was 1.0% (0.01%) per year, in female patients with 5.0-cm to 5.9-cm AAA was 3.9% (0.15%) per year, in male patients with 6.0-cm or greater AAA was 14.1% (0.18%) per year, and in female patients with 6.0-cm or greater AAA was 22.3% (0.95%) per year. Conclusion: The risk of rupture in male patients with AAA 5.0 to 5.9 cm is low. The four-time higher risk of rupture in female patients with AAA 5.0 to 5.9 cm suggests a lower threshold for surgery be considered in fit women. The data regarding risk of rupture in patients with AAA 6.0 cm or more may allow more appropriate decision analysis for surgery in patients with unfit conditions with large AAA.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brown, P. M., Zelt, D. T., Sobolev, B., Hallett, J. W., & Sternbach, Y. (2003). The risk of rupture in untreated aneurysms: The impact of size, gender, and expansion rate. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 37(2), 280–284. https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2003.119

Readers over time

‘10‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 65

64%

Researcher 27

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 71

65%

Engineering 25

23%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8

7%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 6

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0