Putting the Learner into the Curriculum, not the Curriculum into the Learner: A Case for Negotiated Integrated Curriculum

  • O'Grady et. al. E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The question "what is good teaching?" leads to further questions about the nature of curriculum and decision-making. This paper explores the need and feasibility of a Negotiated Integrated Curriculum (NIC) to better empower the voice of teachers and students within their own curriculum. The international neo-liberal agenda that is increasingly encroaching on the nature of curriculum change and development inhibits the voice of learners within their own curriculum. Based on decades of research, and the theoretical foundations of meaningful learning, the NIC progresses the issues of both student and teacher empowerment in the face of this agenda to better allow "good teaching" to happen. Teacher education is significantly placed to enable this process as a review of international educational polices maintain with particular reference to the Irish context.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

O’Grady et. al., E. (2014). Putting the Learner into the Curriculum, not the Curriculum into the Learner: A Case for Negotiated Integrated Curriculum. International Journal of Pedagogical Innovation, 02(02), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.12785/ijpi/020201

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free