At times, obstetricians are called upon to assist pregnant women in making clinical choices between options that may selectively disadvantage either the mother or the fetus. If a mother chooses a therapeutic course that disadvantages the fetus the physician may feel distressed. In this paper we argue that the choices made by mothers are almost always in the interests of the fetus, and supported by physicians. When there is disagreement it is often due to poor communication. While acknowledging that the rare circumstances in which the physician and patient wish to pursue different clinical paths can be stressful for the provider, we explain why obstetricians should accept the judgment of their patient in all instances. Finally, we will maintain that positing a choice between maternal and fetal interests is, in fact, creating a false choice, in as much as options are presented as being exclusive, when in fact that is not the case. © 2007 Future Medicine Ltd.
CITATION STYLE
Minkoff, H., & Paltrow, L. M. (2007). Obstetricians and the rights of pregnant women. Women’s Health, 3(3), 315–319. https://doi.org/10.2217/17455057.3.3.315
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.