Secret Treaties in International Law and the Faith of States in Decentralized Enforcement

  • Azaria D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The modern law of treaties applies regardless of whether a treaty is publicized. The secrecy of an international agreement does not affect its legal force, nonpublicized agreements may be used in interpreting a publicized treaty, and mere failure to comply with domestic requirements concerning publicity does not invalidate the treaty or a state's consent to be bound by it. Under the UN Charter, UN members may not invoke an unregistered treaty or international agreement before a UN organ, but the rules on state responsibility are not concerned with the secrecy or publicity of primary obligations. Injured states may resort to countermeasures for breaches of secret treaty obligations and can suspend compliance with secret treaty obligations as a countermeasure against the responsible state. States may also seek to enforce obligations in secret treaties by bringing claims in international courts and tribunals outside the UN system—and these courts and tribunals have proliferated.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Azaria, D. (2017). Secret Treaties in International Law and the Faith of States in Decentralized Enforcement. AJIL Unbound, 111, 469–473. https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2018.3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free