Negligence, genuine error, and litigation

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
120Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Not all medical injuries are the result of negligence. In fact, most medical injuries are the result either of the inherent risk in the practice of medicine, or due to system errors, which cannot be prevented simply through fear of disciplinary action. This paper will discuss the differences between adverse events, negligence, and system errors; the current medical malpractice tort system in the United States; and review current and future solutions, including medical malpractice reform, alternative dispute resolution, health courts, and no-fault compensation systems. The current political environment favors investigation of non-cap tort reform remedies; investment into more rational oversight systems, such as health courts or no-fault systems may reap both quantitative and qualitative benefits for a less costly and safer health system. © 2013 Sohn, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sohn, D. H. (2013). Negligence, genuine error, and litigation. International Journal of General Medicine. Dove Medical Press Ltd. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S24256

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free