Benefit of permanent non-fire refugia for Lepidoptera conservation in fire-managed sites

87Citations
Citations of this article
104Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

From the early 1990s through 2005, we conducted butterfly transect surveys annually at the same sites in three regions of Wisconsin. We compared specialist butterfly population indices at three sites where a permanent non-fire refugium (a unit kept unburned through cycles of rotational fire elsewhere in the site) was established during this study to indices at comparison sites (which had consistent management throughout this study) in the same region. At Crex Meadows (12,180 ha), all significant changes in specialist numbers skewed toward relatively higher abundance in the refugium (14 ha, last burned in 1988) during the later period (1998-2005) versus 10 comparison subsites (fire-managed in both periods) than expected from observations in the earlier period (1991-97). The same pattern occurred in the refugium (4 ha) at Bauer-Brockway (125 ha), after the rest of that unit (9 ha) had its first management fire. Population trends were positive in these refugia, while the comparison sites usually had less favorable trends, or otherwise had similar trends. At Muralt Bluff (25 ha), regal fritillaries (Speyeria idalia) were more concentrated in the refugium (3 ha, last burned in 1991) during the earlier period but were more abundant in both periods in the refugium than the other units there (fire-managed in both periods). In the earlier period at Muralt Bluff, this species significantly declined, the opposite trend of comparison sites (which always had never-burned refugia), but significantly increased in the later period, similar to comparison sites. The refugium did not benefit Ottoe skipper (Hesperia ottoe), which declined significantly in the earlier period and was not recorded in the later period. Formerly burned units began functioning as refugia only >6-8 years after last fire and continued to increase in benefit for years after that. In fire-managed and fire-prone sites, we recommend the creation of permanent non-fire refugia for Lepidoptera conservation, placed where the most specialists will benefit and managed unintensively (e.g. mowing) if needed. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006.

References Powered by Scopus

Modulation of diversity by grazing and mowing in native tallgrass prairie

814Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A method for assessing changes in the abundance of butterflies

696Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The keystone role of bison in North American tallgrass prairie

663Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Mapped versus actual burned area within wildfire perimeters: Characterizing the unburned

166Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

REVIEW: Refuges for fauna in fire-prone landscapes: Their ecological function and importance

164Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Detecting unburned areas within wildfire perimeters using Landsat and ancillary data across the northwestern United States

103Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Swengel, A. B., & Swengel, S. R. (2007). Benefit of permanent non-fire refugia for Lepidoptera conservation in fire-managed sites. Journal of Insect Conservation, 11(3), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-006-9042-9

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 42

59%

Researcher 18

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 11

15%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54

66%

Environmental Science 26

32%

Energy 1

1%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 1

1%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 13

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0