Inequalities in Smoking and Quitting-Related Outcomes Among Adults With and Without Children in the Household 2013-2019: A Population Survey in England

2Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Smoking among those who live with children is an important influence on smoking initiation among children. This study assessed socioeconomic inequalities in smoking and quitting-related outcomes among all adults with and without children in the household. Aims and Methods: Monthly repeat cross-sectional household survey of adults (16+) from 2013-2019 in England (N = 138 583). We assessed the association between cigarette smoking and quitting-related outcomes and having children in the household, and whether these relationships were moderated by occupational social grade (categories AB-E from most to least advantaged). Trends in smoking prevalence among adults with and without children in the household were explored. Results: In adjusted analysis, the association of having children in the household with smoking prevalence depended on social grade: smoking prevalence was between 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.66-0.77) and 0.93 (0.88-0.98) times lower among social grades AB-D with children in the household relative to those without. Conversely, it was 1.11 (1.05-1.16) times higher among social grade E. Yearly prevalence declined similarly among those with and without children (both prevalence ratio: 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.97-0.99). Motivation to stop smoking was higher among those with children than those without, but lower among disadvantaged than more advantaged groups. Social grades D-E had greater heavy smoking, but higher prevalence of past-month quit attempts. Conclusions: Among the most disadvantaged social grade in England, smoking prevalence was higher in those with children in the household than without. To attenuate future smoking-related inequalities, there is an urgent need to target support and address barriers to quitting and promote longer-term quit success. Implications: In the most disadvantaged occupational social grade, having children in the household was associated with higher smoking prevalence compared with not having children. This contrasts with all other social grades in which there was lower comparative smoking prevalence among those with than without children in the household. Without attention this disparity could exacerbate existing and future health inequalities related to smoking.

References Powered by Scopus

Socioeconomic status and smoking: A review

1167Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Why do poor people behave poorly? Variation in adult health behaviours and psychosocial characteristics by stages of the socioeconomic lifecourse

864Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation

623Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Motivation to stop smoking in the German population between 2016 - 2021 and associated factors: Results from a repeated cross-sectional representative population survey (German Study on Tobacco Use, DEBRA study)

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cutting down, quitting and motivation to stop smoking by self-reported COVID-19 status: Representative cross-sectional surveys in England

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kock, L., Brown, J., Shahab, L., Tattan-Birch, H., Moore, G., & Cox, S. (2022). Inequalities in Smoking and Quitting-Related Outcomes Among Adults With and Without Children in the Household 2013-2019: A Population Survey in England. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 24(5), 690–698. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntab211

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

75%

Researcher 2

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 4

50%

Social Sciences 2

25%

Engineering 1

13%

Environmental Science 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free